31 October, 2008

Game 2: Warriors 108 Raptors 112 (OT)

These games are perhaps the most difficult to blog about. There were several inspiring performances tonight, but none matter because at the end of the day it really comes down to wins and losses. Thus far, the Warriors have played two really close games, both of which they led in the final minutes, and yet lost both. 0-2 in the tough western conference. Luckily our next two games are against somewhat weaker opponents, and there's still plenty of time to recoup, but you just can't help but think, "What If?"

I think the biggest positive tonight was the defense. Aside from the occasional lapse in position or assignment, our man to man ball defense was pretty good. It was good in Game 1 as well, however I became very annoyed of the countless switches. Today still had its fair share of switching on defense but it didn't hurt us like it did in Game 1. I hope this defense continues because down the road teams will look at us and have to game plan around our solid D, particularly in the paint where it seems Turiaf makes it a dead end for the opposition game in and game out.

There were two major weaknesses tonight that really worry me for future games.

1. We obviously have a major issue with our PG situation, and it's really taking a toll on how we run our offense. First of all 18 turnovers is just too much for such a close game. It's inexplicable. More importantly, we lacked a capable floor general down the stretch when we really needed some ball movement and penetration. The last 7 or 8 possessions all had the same basic flaw: no movement at all, and everyone standing around watching one man ISO againt the Raptors. Our success earlier in the game was a result of ball movement and cross-court swinging that got us open shots. This one-on-one basketball, particularly at the end of games where refs like to keep their whistles to themselves, in not smart basketball.

2. Depth- Again, it's one of our supposedly biggest strengths and again Nelson has been reluctant to play anyone other than our main 6 guys consistently. Maggette, Biedrins, Jackson, and Harrington all logged 43+ minutes with a game tommorrow night. That's unacceptable. I understood the first game was opening night and Nelson was trying to steal a game from a great team, but I don't think that excuse really holds up tonight. I'm looking forward to Belinelli and Wright getting 10+ minutes each against New Jersey tomorrow night.

Final Comment: I'd hate to say it but I think we aren't being coached properly. Nelson held an excellent training camp and clearly instilled some defensive identity within these Warriors, but the offense has seriously lacked any potency at all. I don't know how we can actually scare teams, the way we play without a PG the majority of the game, and how we play Iso-basketball every other possession. Down the stretch I think Nelson needs to call some more plays rather than just let Jackson and Maggette take whatever shot they want.

Top Performances
1. Al Harrington- I'm not giving this to him as much for his 26 points as I am for his 11 rebounds. Any time he grabs 8 or more boards I'm excited. And it helped too as we actually out-rebounded the Raptors and their twin towers.

2.Kelenna Azubuike- I didn't mention him last time, but off the bench he and Turiaf have been ridiculously consistent and helpful. I love this guy's game because he boards, takes it to the rack, and can finish. When our offense starts to cool down it's a real boost to the team to have him make one of his plays.

3. Andris Biedrins- This guy has been so consistent the past year or so, his only problem has been staying on the court. I think our offense is much more efficient when we actually use him as opposed to late game situations when he's invisible (there's reasoning of course because he can't hit a free throw but why not use him to at least give someone else a pick).

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

hey loving your recaps bro... keep them going!

Anonymous said...

Great analysis. Totally agree with you on coach Nelson. I think his lack of playing the bench is our main flaw.

Anonymous said...

Also, what are your thoughts on extending Jackson?

AndrewR1388 said...

Thanks for the comments guys...

RE: Jackson extension
I'm obviously not for it at all. Sure, right now he's our most important player, maybe even our best player, but why would we want to sign a guy whos currently 30 to a contract until he's 35? It just makes no sense. He no doubt will be on the decline by the middle to end of the contract and yet will be paid hansomly (ala Foyle? well, Foyle was a different story) Anyhow, Jackson is more valuable to us now as an asset with a shorter contract because 1. if nothing else we can sign FAs after 2 years, and 2. Teams out there are looking for good defensive/clutch players and Jackson on a 2 year deal is a great asset. Notice Detroit news came up about Tayshaun Prince, but I guarantee they won't be interested AT ALL if it's with Jackson on a 5 year deal. Plus, that wouldn't make any sense anyways because why would we give a guy an extension and then trade him... It's really unfortunate that our team's front office is in mayhem right now.

Anonymous said...

Excellent recap, as usual, Andrew. Didn't watch the game tonight, but heard it on radio on XM with the Toronto feed. Two things stood out:
1. It seems that while BWright was in, his man scored practically at will. At least that's how it sounded. Did it look that way as well? Is that why he didn't play in the second half?
2. The pick and roll between Jax and Biedrins seemed to be working well in the middle of the game; as if Toronto could not figure out how to defend it. Why would the Ws go away from that? Especially since Biedrins played for most of the second half.
Let's see how the Ws react to their first second in two nights game against NJ. If they're not too tired (NJ hasn't played since Wednesday, I believe), they should do OK. Next two games on the road are very winnable (at Memphis as well). Your ISO point is very well-taken. If they can't get a PG, perhaps they should try going with a point forward instead (I think they did this a bit in the preseason), especially with teams with slower front courts. Keep up the good work.

Anonymous said...

You're doing a good job, keep it up. Another frustrating game last night, just wondering if you the PG situation can be resolved with the guys we have, or if we need to get somebody through trade. It can be argued that if we had a legitimate PG at the end of both of these games, we would be 2-0.

AndrewR1388 said...

RE: anonymous
1. Ummm to be honest I don't remember it looking like Brandan was getting dominated. He may have been scored on a few times but so did everyone else. He only played 7 minutes as well. Next game I'll try to keep an eye on it to see if that's true.
2. Couldn't agree with you more and I touched on this. I don't under understand why you would go away from something if it's working that well. It worked well in game 1 too actually. And yet when the 4th quarter came along Andris literally became invisible. This is either Don Nelson's fault for not calling the plays or telling the guys in a timeout that they should look for him, or Andris' fault considering he's a captain now and he should voice that he wants the ball if it's actually working

Next anonymous comment: I'm sure it can be resolved somewhat during the majority of the game with a point forward. It's actually been working some when Jackson is trying to get others involved. I don't worry as much about that as I do about late-game situations. Jackson and Maggette aren't looking to create for others down the stretch, and that's when our offense tends to really stall. I don't know if this can be solved without an actual PG. Steinmetz keep repeating he thinks Marcus Williams would do well with the lineup and I wouldn't mind watching it.